-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 793
Fix FastAPI issue with APIRoute subclasses #3681
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
+66
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
090e9c1
to
de946d3
Compare
Fixes: open-telemetry#3671 When an APIRoute subclass would overwrite the matches method with an implementation that depended on non-standard fields existing on the HTTP connection scope, this would cause a failure when the OpenTelemetryMiddleware tried to get the default span details for the incoming request. This has been fixed by using the matches implementation on the Route class for any subclass of Route. This should be sufficient since the only information we are trying to get from that method is the path for the request.
This commit adds tests that illustrate the original issue that was being experienced for custom api route implementations when they depended on non-standard fields existing on the ASGI HTTP connection scope. Before the fix was implemented, the inclusion of a custom API route in the FastAPI application would cause an exception to be raised inside the OpenTelemetryMiddleware since the non-standard fields do not exist on the ASGI HTTP connection scope until after the subsequent middleware runs and adds the expected fields.
299f2de
to
8878698
Compare
emdneto
reviewed
Oct 2, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs CI fix and asserts in the test
instrumentation/opentelemetry-instrumentation-fastapi/tests/test_fastapi_instrumentation.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../opentelemetry-instrumentation-fastapi/src/opentelemetry/instrumentation/fastapi/__init__.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
374130c
to
fcca86c
Compare
emdneto
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2025
xrmx
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
When an APIRoute subclass would overwrite the matches method with an implementation that depended on non-standard fields existing on the HTTP connection scope, this would cause a failure when the OpenTelemetryMiddleware tried to get the default span details for the incoming request. This has been fixed by using the matches implementation on the Route class for any subclass of Route. This should be sufficient since the only information we are trying to get from that method is the path for the request.
Fixes #3671
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
This has been validated with automated tests that are included in this pull request.
Does This PR Require a Core Repo Change?
Checklist:
See contributing.md for styleguide, changelog guidelines, and more.